Osman Gunes Cizmeci on the Changing UX Landscape: Where Design Meets Intelligent Systems

In just a few years, the world of user experience design has shifted from static screens and predictable patterns to a field defined by rapid technological change. Artificial intelligence, spatial computing, and increasingly personalized digital ecosystems are reshaping the work of UX professionals, raising new questions about creativity, accessibility, and ethics.

AI as a Design Partner

Tools like Figma’s AI plugins and Adobe’s generative capabilities are rewriting the speed and scale of prototyping. Tasks that once required hours of wireframing or content drafting can now be automated in seconds.

But efficiency is only one side of the story. Osman Gunes Cizmeci, a New York–based UX/UI designer and commentator on emerging trends, points out that these tools still lack human judgment. In his view, AI can surface possibilities quickly, but it remains the designer’s responsibility to determine what is appropriate for the audience and the moment. The role of human-centered decision-making, he argues, is more essential than ever.

From Dark Mode to Smart Mode

Another emerging shift is the move from static theming (like dark mode) to adaptive interfaces that change depending on context  lighting conditions, device type, or even emotional state inferred from inputs. As sensors and machine learning become more sophisticated, interfaces can respond in ways that once seemed speculative.

Cizmeci believes this adaptability creates both opportunities and risks. While context-aware design can reduce friction, it also demands greater transparency. He stresses that users deserve to understand what drives these changes; without clarity, adaptive systems risk crossing into manipulation.

Spatial UX Arrives

With devices like Apple’s Vision Pro and Meta’s Quest Pro, spatial UX is moving out of the experimental lab and into mainstream development. Designing for environments where digital objects coexist with physical ones demands entirely new heuristics.

According to Cizmeci, this transition requires designers to “unlearn” much of their two-dimensional vocabulary. Guiding attention in 360 degrees or defining accessibility when depth and gesture dominate interaction are questions without established answers. “We’re writing the playbook as we go,” he observes.

Accessibility as Default, Not Add-On

Across the industry, accessibility is no longer seen as a compliance task checked at the end of a project. Instead, it’s increasingly becoming a first principle of design systems. With lawsuits and regulations pushing the issue forward  and with inclusive design gaining broader recognition as good business, more teams are embedding accessibility into their earliest workflows.

Cizmeci calls this cultural shift overdue. He notes that designing inclusively from the start is not only more ethical but more efficient, since retrofitting accessibility later tends to be both costly and incomplete. “The better move is to treat accessibility as a default assumption, something you build around, not bolt on,” he says.

The Ethics Layer

With personalization, AI decision-making, and immersive systems all advancing in tandem, questions of ethics are now inseparable from UX. Designers are increasingly called upon to advocate for transparency, user control, and consent  sometimes in opposition to business incentives that prioritize engagement metrics.

For Cizmeci, the stakes are clear. Every interface, he argues, communicates something about trust. Opaque or manipulative systems don’t just undermine a single product; they shape how people perceive technology more broadly. That, he suggests, is a responsibility the profession cannot afford to ignore.

Looking Ahead

The changing UX landscape is not defined by any single trend, but by the convergence of many: intelligent systems, adaptive interfaces, spatial design, and ethical imperatives. For practitioners, this moment demands both technical fluency and principled leadership.

As Cizmeci puts it, the challenge is not only keeping pace with new tools, but knowing when to lean on automation, when to challenge defaults, and when to pause to ask, “What’s the human need here?”